Brussels, Belgium – European lawmakers have signaled a firm stance against the misuse of artificial intelligence, backing proposals to ban “nudification” apps that create non-consensual intimate images. The vote, taken by the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE), forms part of a broader overhaul of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, known as the Digital Omnibus on AI. The move comes amid growing global concern over the potential for AI-generated deepfakes to inflict significant harm, particularly on women and children.
The impetus for this legislative push was amplified earlier this year following controversy surrounding X’s (formerly Twitter) Grok AI chatbot. Reports emerged that the tool could be exploited to generate sexually explicit images of individuals without their consent, sparking widespread outrage and prompting calls for stricter regulation of AI technologies. Irish broadcaster RTÉ reported on the growing concerns surrounding these applications.
“AI must never be used to humiliate, exploit or endanger people,” stated Independent MEP Michael McNamara, a member of the Renew Europe grouping, emphasizing the Parliament’s commitment to safeguarding citizens from the malicious use of AI. “The Parliament’s position, for the first time, calls for an explicit ban on nudifier applications. These tools inflict real harm on real people. Today, as co-legislators, the European Parliament is sending a clear message that This represents a priority.”
The Digital Omnibus on AI: A Comprehensive Update
The Digital Omnibus on AI isn’t solely focused on banning harmful applications. It represents a significant effort to refine and streamline the implementation of the EU’s landmark AI Act, which aims to establish a comprehensive legal framework for the development and deployment of artificial intelligence technologies across the bloc. The Act categorizes AI systems based on risk, with stricter regulations applied to those deemed “high-risk,” such as those used in critical infrastructure, healthcare and law enforcement. According to a detailed analysis by Nicfab.eu, the proposed changes seek to enhance legal certainty and address potential implementation challenges.
One key area of adjustment concerns the timelines for compliance with the AI Act. Lawmakers have agreed to postpone certain rules pertaining to high-risk AI systems, acknowledging that the necessary standards and guidelines may not be finalized by the original deadline of August 2, 2026. This decision reflects a pragmatic approach, recognizing the complexities involved in developing robust technical standards for AI safety and reliability. The European Parliament’s IMCO committee noted that delaying the implementation of standards would hinder compliance.
the proposed revisions include provisions for extending the timeframe for providers to comply with rules regarding the watermarking of AI-generated content. The initial proposal from the European Commission suggested a deadline of February 2, 2027, for implementing watermarking technologies to identify AI-generated audio, images, videos, and text. Still, MEPs have proposed a shorter extension, setting a new deadline of November 2, 2026. This adjustment aims to accelerate the adoption of transparency measures and combat the spread of misinformation.
Addressing Concerns Over Implementation and Enforcement
The Digital Omnibus also addresses concerns surrounding the practical application and enforcement of the AI Act. The amendments propose clarifying obligations for companies and public authorities, ensuring that the legislation can be implemented more effectively and consistently across the European Union. This includes refining the definitions of key terms and providing more specific guidance on compliance requirements.
The proposed changes also seek to strengthen the powers of the AI Office, the body responsible for overseeing the implementation of the AI Act. The amendments aim to provide the AI Office with more precisely defined powers, enabling it to effectively monitor compliance and enforce the regulations. The European Parliament is also considering enhanced safeguards for sensitive data used in AI systems, particularly concerning bias detection.
Regulatory sandboxes, which allow companies to test innovative AI applications in a controlled environment, are also being revisited. The proposed amendments aim to provide greater guarantees on data protection within these sandboxes, ensuring that privacy rights are respected during the testing phase. The amendments also address the role of conformity assessment bodies, emphasizing the require for cooperation and consistency in their evaluations of AI systems.
The Debate Surrounding the Digital Services Act
The IMCO committee’s agenda extends beyond the AI Act, as evidenced by a recent discussion on the Digital Services Act (DSA). On March 18, 2026, the committee hosted U.S. Congressman Jamie Raskin to discuss criticisms of the DSA leveled by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee. This debate follows a previous discussion with former Commissioner Thierry Breton, who faced scrutiny for his operate on the DSA. The DSA, designed to regulate online platforms and protect users from illegal content, has become a point of contention between the EU and the United States, with some U.S. Lawmakers arguing that it unduly restricts free speech. The European Parliament’s IMCO committee highlights this ongoing dialogue as a key area of focus.
What Happens Next?
The approved proposals now require formal adoption by the European Parliament as a whole, a vote currently scheduled for next week. Following this, negotiations with the EU Council – representing the member states – will commence. These “trilogue” negotiations, expected to take place in March and April, will involve representatives from the Parliament, the Council, and the European Commission, working to reach a consensus on the final text of the legislation. A final plenary adoption is anticipated in June, with the aim of having the amended parts of the AI Act enter into force on August 1, 2026.
The ban on “nudification” apps represents a significant step towards protecting individuals from the harms of AI-generated abuse. However, the broader Digital Omnibus on AI underscores the complex challenges involved in regulating this rapidly evolving technology. Balancing innovation with ethical considerations and ensuring effective enforcement will be crucial as the EU continues to shape the future of artificial intelligence.
The European Outdoor Group (EOG) reported on February 27, 2026 that a key positive amendment was the replacement of the Commission’s proposal to link the application date to the adoption of supporting tools by the Commission with fixed application deadlines: December 2, 2027, for Annex III systems and August 2, 2028, for Annex I systems.
As the legislative process progresses, stakeholders across the technology industry, civil society, and government will be closely watching to see how the EU’s AI framework takes shape. The outcome will have far-reaching implications for the development and deployment of AI technologies, not only within the European Union but also globally.
Stay tuned to World Today Journal for further updates on this developing story. We encourage you to share your thoughts and perspectives in the comments below.
Related reading