New Delhi police have faced mounting criticism following a series of confrontations with demonstrators protesting systemic issues within India’s education sector. Human rights organizations and observers have raised significant concerns regarding the use of force, barricades, and the restriction of digital communication during the recent unrest at Jantar Mantar. The protests, which center on allegations of examination paper leaks and the subsequent impact on millions of students, have led to heightened tensions between youth-led movements and state authorities.
The unrest follows a turbulent period for India’s national testing infrastructure. In May 2026, reports of a question paper leak compromised the NEET-UG medical entrance examination. The resulting cancellation of the exam impacted more than two million students, forcing a widespread re-examination. This disruption sparked national outcry, with reports from local media outlets documenting instances of student suicides attributed to the extreme academic stress and uncertainty surrounding the testing delays.
Protest Escalation and Police Response
Demonstrations intensified on July 20, as protesters marched toward the Parliament of India to demand the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The participants, largely organized under the youth-led banner of the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), have called for systemic accountability and financial reparations. Specifically, the movement is seeking a payment of INR 1 crore (approximately USD 104,050) for the families of each student who allegedly died by suicide due to distress linked to the examination leaks.
During the mobilization, authorities implemented significant security measures to limit the movement of demonstrators. Reports indicate that the Delhi Police installed barricades to prevent crowds from reaching the Parliament building. Further, authorities implemented temporary suspensions of mobile internet services and restricted metro access in the vicinity of the protest sites. These measures, while intended to maintain public order, have been characterized by human rights advocates as an infringement on the constitutional right to peaceful assembly.
Allegations of Excessive Force
The conduct of law enforcement during the Jantar Mantar demonstrations has been a primary point of contention. Social media platforms have hosted numerous videos and eyewitness accounts alleging that officers employed excessive force, including the use of batons and tear gas against demonstrators. Some reports allege that police personnel threw stones at the protesters, a claim that has drawn calls for an independent inquiry.
The response to these events has drawn sharp criticism from global and national civil society actors. Critics argue that the actions taken by the Delhi Police fail to meet the international standards of legality, necessity, and proportionality required when policing peaceful dissent. There have been formal calls for the Delhi Police to exercise restraint and for an impartial investigation into all allegations of misconduct, including the use of batons, tear gas, and stone-throwing against peaceful participants.
Hunger Strikes and Medical Intervention
The protest movement also saw the involvement of activist Sonam Wangchuk, who had been engaged in a hunger strike to support the students’ demands. On July 18, the 21st day of his fast, police intervened to move Wangchuk to a hospital. According to accounts of the incident, the activist was transferred against his express wishes. This intervention highlighted the growing friction between the state’s duty to ensure public safety and the rights of individuals to engage in non-violent protest through fasting.
The situation remains fluid as students and activists continue to press for long-term policy reforms. As of the latest reports, there has been no official statement regarding the specific demands for ministerial resignation or the proposed compensation packages. Observers are now looking toward the next scheduled parliamentary session for any potential government response or legislative adjustments regarding the National Testing Agency’s oversight mechanisms. Readers are encouraged to monitor updates from official government portals and verified news outlets for developments regarding the ongoing investigations into police conduct and the status of the education reform demands.
Keep reading