London, United Kingdom – Escalating tensions in the Middle East, following recent military actions involving Iran, are sending ripples through global financial markets, particularly impacting emerging market (EM) sovereign debt. A surge in energy prices and a renewed risk-off sentiment are creating a challenging macroeconomic environment for many nations, according to analysis from ING Group and other financial institutions. The situation is particularly acute for countries heavily reliant on energy imports, while exporters stand to benefit from the price increases.
The immediate trigger for this volatility was a series of strikes carried out over the weekend by Israeli and U.S. Military forces against targets within Iran, resulting in the deaths of several senior Iranian officials, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, according to reports. ING Belgium details that Iran retaliated by attacking U.S. Interests in the region, causing collateral damage and civilian casualties in Gulf countries, and notably, by threatening closure of the Strait of Hormuz – a critical waterway for global oil and gas transit.
Energy Price Shock and Divergent Impacts
The most significant global macroeconomic consequence of the escalating conflict has been a dramatic spike in energy prices. Brent crude oil has risen by more than $82 per barrel since mid-February, climbing from below $70 to over $152 as of early March 2026, according to ING’s analysis. This surge is creating a divergence in economic fortunes across emerging markets, separating energy importers from exporters.
Large energy importers are facing increased pressure from higher oil and gas prices, leading to inflationary concerns and worsening external balances. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are particularly vulnerable, with North Macedonia, Serbia, Hungary, and Turkey identified as the most exposed within the region. However, the impact extends far beyond CEE, affecting African frontier economies like Zambia and Senegal, as well as Panama, El Salvador in Latin America, and Pakistan in Asia, all of which have significant net fuel import dependencies.
Conversely, oil-exporting nations are poised to benefit from the higher prices. The extent of this benefit will depend on their production capacity and existing commitments, but the increased revenue stream offers a potential buffer against the broader economic headwinds.
Two Potential Scenarios for Conflict Escalation
The future trajectory of the conflict, and its subsequent impact on global markets, hinges on how the situation unfolds. ING has outlined two primary scenarios, as detailed in a report by Insurance Edge. The first, a relatively contained scenario, envisions a swift resolution within four to seven days. This would involve the U.S. And Israeli forces exhausting fixed military targets, leading to a de-facto ceasefire. Iranian retaliation would be limited, sufficient for domestic political purposes but not triggering a full-scale escalation. The Strait of Hormuz would experience harassment, but not a complete disruption, as Tehran relies on it for its own oil exports to China.
Under this scenario, markets would likely observe an initial oil price spike followed by a gradual decline as fears of Hormuz disruption subside. A temporary war premium would be factored into asset prices, but without lasting macroeconomic implications – mirroring the market response to similar events in June 2025.
However, the second scenario paints a far more concerning picture: a “forever war” characterized by sustained conflict and escalating tensions. This scenario assumes that Iranian retaliation, which has already impacted ten countries, continues to escalate, prompting further strikes against infrastructure and mobile assets. With regime survival at stake, Iran would resort to asymmetric economic warfare, including sustained harassment of tanker traffic, activation of Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping, and attempts to disrupt the Strait of Hormuz. President Trump has suggested such a conflict could last four to five weeks.
Geopolitical Risk and Sovereign Credit Implications
The heightened geopolitical risk is already weighing on sovereign creditworthiness, particularly in emerging markets. ING’s James Wilson, EM Sovereign Strategist, notes that EM credit is now facing a tougher macro backdrop. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) sovereigns are particularly vulnerable due to their proximity to the conflict and potential for direct involvement. The risk-off mood is reversing the recent improvement in EM sentiment, making it more difficult for these nations to access capital and manage their debt burdens.
The potential disruption to the Strait of Hormuz is a major concern. This vital shipping lane handles approximately 20% of global oil supply, and any significant disruption could lead to a substantial increase in energy prices and further exacerbate inflationary pressures worldwide. The implications for global trade and economic growth are significant.
The situation is further complicated by the potential for regional escalation. The involvement of other actors, such as Hezbollah and various proxy groups, could broaden the conflict and increase the risk of a wider war. This would have devastating consequences for the region and the global economy.
Impact on Specific Regions
Beyond the GCC, several other regions are facing heightened risks. CEE countries, as mentioned earlier, are particularly vulnerable to higher energy prices. African frontier markets with large energy deficits, such as Zambia and Senegal, are also at risk. In Latin America, Panama and El Salvador are exposed, as is Pakistan in Asia. These countries may struggle to finance their energy imports and could face balance of payments crises.
The conflict also has implications for global supply chains. Disruptions to shipping routes could lead to delays and increased costs for businesses, further contributing to inflationary pressures. The uncertainty surrounding the conflict is also likely to dampen investment and economic activity.
Looking Ahead
The situation in Iran remains highly fluid and unpredictable. The next few days and weeks will be critical in determining the trajectory of the conflict and its impact on global markets. Investors and policymakers will be closely monitoring developments in the region and assessing the risks and opportunities. The U.S. State Department is scheduled to hold a press briefing on March 12th to provide an update on the situation and outline the administration’s response. Further developments are expected following a scheduled United Nations Security Council meeting on March 15th.
The potential for further escalation remains high, and the economic consequences could be severe. A prolonged conflict could lead to a significant increase in energy prices, a slowdown in global economic growth, and increased geopolitical instability. It is crucial for all parties involved to exercise restraint and seek a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
What are your thoughts on the evolving situation in Iran and its potential impact on the global economy? Share your comments below and join the conversation.
Keep reading