Decline in On-Duty Lawyer Registrations Raises Concerns for Criminal Justice Access in Japan
Tokyo, Japan – A growing trend of declining registrations among on-duty lawyers – those providing immediate legal counsel to individuals in police custody – is raising concerns about access to justice within Japan’s criminal justice system. Recent data reveals a continuing decrease in the number of attorneys participating in this crucial role, particularly in urban areas, prompting fears about the potential for wrongful convictions and a strain on the system’s ability to ensure fair legal representation.
The latest figures, released on February 28, 2026, by the Japan Federation of Bar Associations (JFBA), indicate that only 30.9% of the nation’s lawyers were registered as on-duty counsel in 2025. This marks a further decline from the already historically low rate of 32.3% recorded in 2024, representing the lowest percentage since the statistics began being tracked. The Kochi Shimbun reported that some urban centers have seen over 100 lawyers withdraw from the on-duty roster in the past year alone.
The Role of On-Duty Lawyers in Japan’s Legal System
Japan’s legal framework stipulates that individuals arrested and detained are entitled to legal counsel. However, a period of up to 72 hours can elapse between arrest and the assignment of a public defender. This gap is filled by the on-duty lawyer system, where registered attorneys volunteer to be available for immediate consultation. These lawyers provide crucial initial advice, explain rights to detainees, and can begin building a defense strategy before formal charges are filed. The system is designed to safeguard against potential abuses of power and ensure due process.
The on-duty system operates by assigning standby days to registered lawyers, who are then contacted if an arrested individual requests legal representation. This immediate access to counsel is considered a vital safeguard against self-incrimination and ensures that suspects understand their rights during a vulnerable period.
Reasons for the Declining Participation
The JFBA’s report points to several factors contributing to the dwindling number of on-duty lawyers. Increasingly, attorneys are citing the heavy workload and relatively low compensation as deterrents to participation. According to the Nikkei, the demands of the role, coupled with insufficient financial incentives, are leading many lawyers to opt out of the system.
This decline raises serious concerns about the potential for wrongful convictions. Without immediate legal guidance, individuals may unknowingly waive their rights or provide information that could be detrimental to their defense. The system’s effectiveness in preventing miscarriages of justice is directly linked to the availability of qualified on-duty counsel.
Regional Disparities and Specific Cases
The decline in registrations is not uniform across Japan. The Second Tokyo Bar Association has experienced a particularly sharp drop, with numbers falling from 894 in 2024 to 603 in 2025. This resulted in a registration rate of just 9.2%, the lowest in the country. The association attributes this decrease to a shift to a renewal-based registration system and mandatory training requirements, stating that sufficient personnel are still available. However, the overall trend remains concerning.
The Osaka Bar Association also saw a significant reduction, with 108 fewer lawyers registered in 2025 compared to the previous year, bringing the registration rate down to 21.9%. Other regions with low registration rates include the First Tokyo (13.0%), Saitama (25.1%), and Tokyo (29.1%) bar associations.
Impact on the Criminal Justice System
The decreasing participation in the on-duty lawyer system places a greater burden on those who remain, potentially leading to burnout and a decline in the quality of representation. It also raises questions about the long-term sustainability of the system and its ability to effectively fulfill its intended purpose.
The JFBA’s white paper highlights the urgent demand to address the underlying issues driving lawyers away from the on-duty roster. Potential solutions include increasing compensation, reducing the workload, and providing greater support for participating attorneys. Without such measures, the future of this vital safeguard within Japan’s criminal justice system remains uncertain.
The Broader Context of Legal Aid in Japan
The challenges facing the on-duty lawyer system are part of a broader discussion about access to legal aid in Japan. While the country has a system of public defenders, it is often understaffed and underfunded, leaving many individuals without adequate legal representation. The on-duty lawyer system serves as a critical supplement to public defense, providing immediate assistance during the crucial initial stages of arrest and detention.
The decline in on-duty lawyer registrations underscores the need for a comprehensive review of Japan’s legal aid system, including increased investment in public defense and measures to attract and retain qualified attorneys in both public and on-duty roles.
What Happens Next?
The JFBA is expected to present its findings and recommendations to the Japanese government in the coming months. Discussions are anticipated regarding potential policy changes aimed at incentivizing lawyer participation in the on-duty system. Further data on registration rates will be released in February 2027, providing a clearer picture of whether the trend is continuing or if recent efforts are beginning to yield positive results.
The situation warrants close monitoring, as the availability of on-duty legal counsel is fundamental to upholding the principles of due process and ensuring a fair and just legal system for all in Japan.
Do you have thoughts on this developing story? Share your comments below.
Keep reading