Maribel Guardia Seeks Over $2 Million from Former Daughter-in-Law in Ongoing Legal Dispute
Mexico City – A protracted legal battle between actress Maribel Guardia and her former daughter-in-law, Imelda Garza Tuñón, has taken a new turn with Guardia seeking over 2 million Mexican pesos (approximately $110,000 USD as of March 13, 2026) in financial compensation. The claim, as reported by multiple Mexican news outlets, stems from Garza Tuñón’s residency at Guardia’s home during her marriage to the late Julián Figueroa. The dispute, which began with allegations of domestic violence, continues to unfold with increasing financial stakes, impacting the family of the late singer-actor.
The legal proceedings, now exceeding a year in duration, center around a demand for what Guardia’s legal team describes as compensation for Garza Tuñón’s time living in her property. According to statements from Garza Tuñón’s lawyers, the calculation is based on the “mínimo vital indispensable” – the minimum wage required for basic living expenses – applied to each month Garza Tuñón resided at the home. This equates to 30 days of the current minimum wage for each month, resulting in a total claim exceeding 2 million pesos. The case has become increasingly complex, involving other members of the Figueroa family and focusing on the well-being of José Julián, the minor son of Julián Figueroa and Imelda Garza Tuñón.
The Roots of the Dispute: Domestic Violence Allegations and Custody
The initial catalyst for the legal conflict was a complaint filed by Maribel Guardia in January 2025, alleging domestic violence against her former daughter-in-law. Guardia’s stated motivation was the protection of her grandson, José Julián. Infobae reports that this complaint initiated a series of legal maneuvers and counter-accusations. Subsequently, José Manuel Figueroa, Julián Figueroa’s brother, as well filed a complaint against Garza Tuñón, alleging moral damage and media-driven violence. While the matter of José Julián’s custody has reportedly been resolved, the financial claims continue to be litigated.
The situation is further complicated by the tragic death of Julián Figueroa in March 2023. Figueroa, a popular singer and actor, passed away from a heart attack, leaving behind his son and a fractured family dynamic. The legal battle with Garza Tuñón has intensified in the wake of his death, with both sides seemingly entrenched in their positions. The current demand for over 2 million pesos represents a significant escalation in the financial aspect of the dispute.
Garza Tuñón’s Defense: An Unjustified Financial Claim
Imelda Garza Tuñón’s legal team vehemently contests the validity of Guardia’s financial demand. They argue that the request is unjustified, given the familial nature of the arrangement and the fact that Guardia willingly provided accommodation to her former daughter-in-law and grandson. El Imparcial details that the lawyers characterize the claim as inappropriate, particularly considering the circumstances. They maintain that the arrangement was one of family support and hospitality, not a commercial agreement requiring financial remuneration.
The lawyers further contend that the calculation based on the “mínimo vital indispensable” is a misapplication of the law. They argue that this metric is intended for situations involving formal employment or contractual obligations, not familial relationships. The defense team is preparing to challenge the claim in court, asserting that it lacks legal basis and is motivated by personal animosity rather than legitimate financial loss. The legal team believes the request is an attempt to further burden Garza Tuñón, who is already grieving the loss of her husband.
The Legal Framework and Potential Outcomes
The legal basis for Guardia’s claim rests on the concept of unjust enrichment, a principle of Mexican law that prevents one party from unfairly benefiting at the expense of another. However, establishing unjust enrichment in a familial context can be challenging, requiring proof that Garza Tuñón received a benefit to which she was not entitled and that Guardia suffered a corresponding loss. The court will need to weigh the evidence presented by both sides and determine whether Guardia can demonstrate a legitimate financial claim.
Legal experts suggest that the outcome of the case will likely depend on several factors, including the specific details of any prior agreements between Guardia and Garza Tuñón, the extent to which Guardia can demonstrate financial harm, and the court’s interpretation of the “mínimo vital indispensable” in this particular context. The case could potentially set a precedent for similar disputes involving family members and property rights. The proceedings are being closely watched by legal observers and the Mexican public, given the high-profile nature of the individuals involved.
Impact on the Figueroa Family
The ongoing legal battle is undoubtedly exacerbating tensions within the Figueroa family. The death of Julián Figueroa has already left a significant void, and the public dispute between his mother and widow is adding to the emotional strain. The well-being of José Julián, the young son at the center of the conflict, is a primary concern. Both Guardia and Garza Tuñón have expressed their desire to protect his interests, but their conflicting legal strategies are creating a challenging environment for the child.
The dispute is also playing out in the public eye, with details of the legal proceedings frequently appearing in the Mexican media. This public scrutiny is likely adding to the stress and emotional burden on all parties involved. The family’s reputation is also at stake, as the details of the dispute are widely disseminated. The resolution of the case will be crucial for restoring a sense of stability and closure for the Figueroa family.
As of March 13, 2026, the case remains active, with the next scheduled court hearing set for April 15, 2026. During this hearing, both sides are expected to present further evidence and arguments. The court will then deliberate and issue a ruling on the validity of Guardia’s claim. The outcome of this hearing will likely determine the future course of the legal battle and the financial implications for both parties. Readers are encouraged to share their thoughts on this developing story in the comments below and to share this article with others interested in following this complex legal dispute.
Related reading