The mayor of Vichy, Frédéric Aguilera, has formally requested that the French Ministry of Culture and the National Archives reconsider the use of the term “Vichy regime” when referring to the French government between 1940 and 1944. In an open letter addressed to the state, the mayor argues that the persistent association of the city’s name with the collaborative government led by Philippe Pétain unfairly stigmatizes the contemporary municipality and its residents.
This request highlights a long-standing tension between historical nomenclature and the modern identity of the spa town. While the term “Vichy regime” is standard in academic and historical discourse to describe the French State (État français), local officials contend that the continued use of the city’s name as a synonym for the collaborationist government hinders the city’s efforts to move beyond its wartime past.
Historical Context of the “Vichy Regime”
The term “Vichy regime” emerged during the Second World War to designate the government that succeeded the Third Republic. Following the armistice of June 22, 1940, the armistice agreement signed in Compiègne led to the establishment of the seat of government in Vichy, chosen primarily for its hotel infrastructure and telephone exchange capabilities. The government, led by Marshal Philippe Pétain, eventually implemented policies of collaboration with Nazi Germany.
Historians generally maintain that the term is an essential historiographical shorthand. According to the Memorial Alsace-Moselle, the regime is characterized by its “National Revolution” ideology, which sought to dismantle the democratic institutions of the French Republic. The use of the city’s name in this context is widely considered by scholars to be a geographical identifier rather than an indictment of the city’s current population.
The Mayor’s Position on Local Identity
Frédéric Aguilera, who has served as mayor since 2017, has frequently expressed his frustration regarding the conflation of the historical period with the modern town. In his communication to the government, he emphasizes that the residents of Vichy, a town known for its UNESCO World Heritage thermal baths, are tired of the automatic negative association triggered by the city’s name.

The city has actively worked to address its history through education and public memorialization. In 2021, the city inaugurated a new memorial trail designed to provide context and historical accuracy to visitors. The municipal government argues that by rebranding the historical period in official communications, the state could help distinguish the actions of a centralized government from the heritage of the local community.
National Archives and Historical Naming
The French Ministry of Culture, which oversees the National Archives, has not yet issued a formal policy change regarding the terminology. The debate touches upon a broader issue in French historiography: the responsibility of the state in acknowledging the crimes committed during the occupation. In 1995, President Jacques Chirac officially acknowledged the responsibility of the French state in the deportation of Jews, a milestone in the nation’s reckoning with the Vél d’Hiv roundup.
Academic institutions remain cautious about altering historical labels. Many researchers argue that changing the name of the “Vichy regime” could risk obscuring the historical reality of the era. The consensus among the historical community is that the term serves as an important anchor for the memory of the collaborationist state, rather than a label for the town itself.
What Happens Next
There is currently no scheduled legislative or administrative hearing to debate the nomenclature of the Vichy period. The request from the mayor’s office remains an appeal to the Ministry of Culture for a shift in official terminology. As the debate continues, the city of Vichy remains a significant site for historical research and tourism, with ongoing efforts to balance its complex past with its present-day identity.

Readers interested in the official record of this period can consult the archives provided by the National Archives of France, which offer extensive documentation on the administrative functions of the government during the 1940–1944 period. We invite our readers to share their perspectives on the balance between historical accuracy and modern branding in the comments section below.