The Power of Believing Untruths: Why Misinformation Resonates with a Symbolic Mindset
We live in an era saturated with readily available facts. Yet, demonstrably false claims continue to thrive, especially within the political sphere. Why do some individuals cling to misinformation even when presented with overwhelming evidence to the contrary? New research suggests it’s not about a lack of facts, but a fundamental difference in how people process information – specifically, a prioritization of symbolic strength over factual accuracy.
This article delves into the psychology behind embracing easily disproven claims, exploring the link between this mindset and broader societal trends. We’ll examine why debunking often fails and how this phenomenon can be leveraged for political gain.
Beyond Facts: The Rise of Symbolic Thinking
For many,political beliefs aren’t about objective truth. Instead, they’re about signaling identity and demonstrating allegiance to a particular group. Consider the persistent claims surrounding the 2020 election or exaggerated narratives about crime rates in Washington D.C. – readily debunked by fact-checks and explored in thoughtful analyses.
However, to someone prioritizing symbolic meaning, these rebuttals aren’t persuasive.They’re seen as attacks from an “out-group,” confirming their existing biases. The availability of correct information becomes irrelevant.What truly matters is the appearance of unwavering conviction.
Why Outlandish Claims Gain Traction
Interestingly, the more easily disproven a claim, the more powerful it can seem to those with a symbolic mindset. Being a contrarian – an “edgelord” – or even outright lying can be perceived as “authentic.” This might seem counterintuitive, but it speaks to a desire for distinction and a rejection of mainstream narratives.
You might encounter individuals who view these claims as provocative trolling.However, this mindset often carries a dangerous undercurrent. they may want those far-fetched claims to be acted upon, even if they’re transparently false. Think of calls for deploying the national Guard based on fabricated threats.
Is It All Just 5-D Chess?
could there be a strategic advantage to believing – and promoting - untruths? It’s possible. Symbolic beliefs can function as:
* negotiation tactics: Presenting an extreme position to create room for compromise.
* Loyalty tests: Identifying who is truly “on your side.”
* Self-fulfilling prophecies: A “fake it till you make it” approach, hoping to eventually turn fiction into reality.
Political theorist Murray Edelman highlighted how politicians often prioritize symbolic victories over tangible results. It’s simply easier to score points with rhetoric than to deliver complex solutions. Leaders can offer symbolism when concrete achievements are lacking.
the Link to Authoritarianism
This prioritization of symbolic strength isn’t merely a quirk of personality. Research indicates a strong correlation between endorsing easily disproven claims and authoritarian tendencies. This suggests a broader pattern of valuing order, conformity, and strong leadership – even at the expense of truth and reason.
What Does This Mean for You?
Understanding this dynamic is crucial for navigating today’s information landscape. Here’s what you can do:
* Recognize the pattern: be aware that some individuals aren’t seeking truth, but validation of their existing beliefs.
* Focus on shared values: Instead of directly challenging misinformation, try to connect on common ground.
* Promote critical thinking: Encourage others to question sources and evaluate evidence.
* Don’t underestimate the power of symbolism: Acknowledge that emotions and identity play a notable role in shaping beliefs.
Ultimately, combating misinformation requires more than just presenting facts. It demands a deeper understanding of the psychological and social forces that drive people to embrace untruths.
Randy Stein is Associate professor of Marketing at *California State Polytechnic University
