On Tuesday, April 21, 2026, the trial of a 19-year-old man accused of fatally stabbing his teacher opened in Pau, France, more than three years after the incident occurred. The case, which has drawn national attention, centers on the psychological state of the accused at the time of the attack and whether he possessed the discernment required to be held criminally responsible.
The defendant, who was 16 years old when he attacked Agnès Lassalle, a 53-year-old Spanish teacher, allegedly stabbed her once in the chest during a classroom lesson at the private Saint-Thomas d’Aquin school in Saint-Jean-de-Luz on February 22, 2023. According to court records and investigative reports cited in French media, he concealed a knife inside a paper towel roll before approaching his teacher from behind and delivering a single blow while students looked on in shock.
During police questioning following his arrest, the teenager reportedly told investigators that he had been influenced by “a small voice” that urged him to commit violence, describing it as selfish, manipulative, and egocentric. He claimed this internal voice had suggested the attack the day before it occurred. These statements became a focal point in the psychiatric evaluations conducted during the investigation.
Three psychological expert assessments were carried out as part of the judicial instruction. Two of the three experts concluded that the accused retained sufficient discernment to understand the nature and consequences of his actions, supporting a finding of criminal responsibility. The third expert, however, determined that he suffered from a deterioration or abolition of discernment at the time of the act, which could exempt him from penal liability under French law.
The defense lawyer, Maître Thierry Sagardoytho, has emphasized that the conflicting expert opinions will be central to the proceedings. “The discernment of the accused will be at the heart of the debates,” he stated in pre-trial remarks reported by multiple French news outlets. “The file contains three expert opinions with diametrically opposed conclusions.” He also indicated that he intends to scrutinize the quality of mental health care the teenager received prior to the attack.
Records show that the accused had attempted suicide in October 2022 by ingesting medication and was undergoing medical treatment for psychological disorders at the time of the stabbing. His legal team has questioned whether earlier intervention or more robust psychiatric support might have prevented the tragedy, raising broader concerns about adolescent mental health monitoring in educational settings.
The trial is being held behind closed doors (à huis clos) because the defendant was a minor when the offense was committed. Under French judicial procedure, cases involving minors accused of serious crimes may be heard in private to protect their privacy, even though the severity of the charge—assassination—has prompted public debate about transparency in such proceedings.
Agnès Lassalle was widely remembered by colleagues and students as a dedicated educator who had taught at the Saint-Thomas d’Aquin institution for several years. Her death prompted an outpouring of grief in the Basque Country community and led to renewed discussions about school safety and the early identification of behavioral risks in adolescents.
As the trial unfolds, legal experts are watching closely to see how the court reconciles the divergent expert testimony on the defendant’s mental state. The outcome could hinge on whether the judges accept the majority view that he was criminally responsible or side with the minority opinion that his psychological condition negated his capacity to distinguish right from wrong at the moment of the attack.
The next scheduled development in the case is the continuation of witness testimony and expert cross-examination, with no date yet set for a verdict. The proceedings remain subject to the pace of the criminal assizes court in Pau, which handles serious criminal matters including acts of violence resulting in death.
For updates on this case and other developments in French judicial affairs, readers are encouraged to follow official court communications and reputable news sources covering the story.
Keep reading