No Kings? Meet King Don and King John Part 2 of 3 – Trump’s Assault on Habeas Corpus and the Rule of Law in America

SEATTLE. USA, April 24 (IPS) – The phrase “habeas tattoo” has emerged as a provocative symbol in recent protests against what critics describe as systematic erosion of constitutional safeguards under the Trump administration. This imagery, appearing on demonstrators’ skin and signs, reflects growing public concern over policies perceived to undermine due process and habeas corpus — two foundational legal protections enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

Habeas corpus, often called the “great writ,” is a legal action that requires a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court, securing the right to challenge unlawful detention. Rooted in English common law and enshrined in Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution, it states that “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” Due process, guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, ensures fair treatment through the judicial system, particularly in cases involving deprivation of life, liberty, or property.

Recent actions by the Department of Homeland Security have intensified scrutiny over immigration enforcement practices. In summer 2025, DHS issued a directive interpreting the Immigration and Nationality Act to mandate detention for nearly all noncitizens apprehended by immigration authorities while their cases proceed — a significant shift from prior discretion in bond eligibility. This policy has triggered a wave of legal challenges, with federal courts inundated by habeas corpus petitions from detainees asserting their right to bond hearings.

Judicial pushback has been widespread, and consistent. An analysis by Judge Lewis Kaplan of the Southern District of New York found that out of 362 habeas corpus cases challenging the DHS detention policy nationwide, judges rejected the government’s position in all but 12 instances. Kaplan concluded that “the overwhelming, lopsided majority have held that the law still means what it always has meant,” affirming that long-term residents retain constitutional protections regardless of immigration status.

Legal scholars warn that undermining these protections for any group risks establishing dangerous precedents. Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, emphasizes that due process “means the government can’t impose harm on somebody unless there are fair procedures.” He and others caution that when such norms are weakened for immigrants, the protections for all citizens become more vulnerable.

The administration maintains its stance despite judicial setbacks, signaling intent to pursue the matter through appellate courts and potentially the Supreme Court. Some legal observers suggest the administration is persisting in anticipation of a favorable ruling at the nation’s highest judicial level, though current lower court rulings present a significant hurdle.

Public demonstrations have grown in response, with events like the May Day rally in Santa Rosa on May 1, 2025, drawing hundreds who marched calling for immigrant rights and the preservation of due process. Protesters carried signs and bore temporary tattoos reading “habeas” as a visual assertion of their demand for judicial oversight and constitutional fidelity.

As of April 2026, the legal battle continues to unfold across federal district courts, with no definitive resolution from higher courts yet issued. The outcome could significantly influence the balance between executive authority in immigration enforcement and the judiciary’s role in safeguarding individual liberties.

For ongoing updates on court rulings related to habeas corpus and immigration detention, readers can consult the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system or monitor releases from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

What are your thoughts on the current state of habeas corpus protections in the United States? Share your perspective in the comments below and support spread awareness by sharing this article.