Zurich, Switzerland – A young content creator in Zurich is facing a hefty bill of approximately 8,000 Swiss francs (roughly $8,900 USD as of March 5, 2026) after using a copyrighted song in a video posted to her parents’ tennis school Instagram account. The case highlights the growing complexities of copyright law in the age of social media and the potential financial risks for even casual content creators. The incident underscores the importance of understanding music licensing, even for seemingly innocuous online posts.
Mary, a 25-year-old TikToker, created a short video for the Instagram account of her parents’ tennis school, which has around 800 followers. The video, posted two years ago, featured the song “Pedro,” a 2024 hit by German DJ Jaxomy and Italo-German artist Agatino Romero. The post garnered approximately 2,300 views. Mary initially believed she was helping her parents promote their business and didn’t consider the potential copyright implications. “We are a small account, I didn’t think about it,” she told 20 Minutes, a Swiss news outlet. 20 Minutes
Copyright Claims and Legal Action
Recently, Mary received a demand for payment from a German law firm representing the copyright holders of “Pedro.” The firm is seeking nearly 8,000 francs to cover alleged licensing fees for the use of the song. The demand letter gave Mary only five days to respond. “At first, I thought it was a fake,” she said, expressing shock at the unexpected legal challenge, especially given the time that had passed since the original post. She described the amount demanded as “malicious” and “a lot of money.”
The family has since consulted with a Swiss lawyer and, as of now, has not paid the demanded sum. They intend to contact the German law firm to discuss the matter further. The situation is not unique, with reports emerging of similar demands being sent to other small content creators. German influencer and entrepreneur Christian Wolf has publicly reported a “wave of warning letters” from a record label affiliated with Sony Music. 20 Minutes
The Rise of Copyright Trolling and Social Media
This case is part of a broader trend of copyright enforcement targeting social media users. Copyright holders are increasingly monitoring platforms like Instagram and TikTok for unauthorized use of their intellectual property. Although large corporations often have the resources to negotiate licenses, smaller creators are particularly vulnerable to these types of claims. The practice has led to accusations of “copyright trolling,” where legal threats are used to extract settlements from individuals or small businesses, even for minor infringements.
The legal basis for these claims rests on the principle that any public performance of a copyrighted work requires a license from the copyright holder. This includes using a song in a video posted online, even if the account is not monetized. The specifics of licensing fees can vary widely depending on the song, the platform, and the scope of the use.
Navigating Copyright Law on Social Media
Experts advise content creators to be mindful of copyright restrictions when using music or other copyrighted material in their posts. Several options are available to avoid potential legal issues:
- Use royalty-free music: Numerous websites offer music that can be used without licensing fees.
- Obtain a license: Creators can directly license music from copyright holders or through performing rights organizations.
- Utilize platform-provided music libraries: Platforms like Instagram and TikTok often have libraries of pre-cleared music that users can incorporate into their videos.
- Understand fair use: In some cases, limited use of copyrighted material may be permissible under “fair use” doctrines, but this is a complex legal area and should be approached with caution.
The case of Mary in Zurich serves as a cautionary tale for anyone creating content online. Even seemingly harmless posts can carry significant legal risks if copyright laws are not carefully considered. The incident highlights the need for greater awareness among content creators about their legal obligations and the potential consequences of copyright infringement. MSN
The Role of Performing Rights Organizations
Performing rights organizations (PROs) like SOCAN (Canada), ASCAP and BMI (United States), and GEMA (Germany) play a crucial role in managing and collecting royalties for musical works. These organizations license the public performance of music to businesses and individuals, and distribute the royalties to songwriters and publishers. The German law firm involved in Mary’s case likely represents the interests of a PRO or the copyright holder directly. Understanding how these organizations operate is essential for anyone using music in a commercial context.
The situation too raises questions about the responsibility of social media platforms to protect their users from copyright claims. While platforms generally have policies in place to address copyright infringement, critics argue that they could do more to proactively identify and prevent unauthorized use of copyrighted material.
As social media continues to evolve, the legal landscape surrounding copyright will undoubtedly become even more complex. Content creators must stay informed about their rights and obligations to avoid costly legal battles and protect their creative work. The case of Mary serves as a stark reminder that even a seemingly innocent Instagram post can have significant financial repercussions.
The next step in Mary’s case will likely involve a response from her Swiss legal counsel to the German law firm. The outcome of this exchange will determine whether the matter proceeds to litigation or is resolved through negotiation. We will continue to follow this story and provide updates as they become available. Share your thoughts on this developing situation in the comments below.
Related reading