Taiwan Strait” data-width=”1280″ data-height=”720″>Credit: Daniel Ceng
the escalating tensions surrounding Taiwan are increasingly drawing parallels to the situation in Venezuela, prompting a reevaluation of how major powers navigate international law and pursue their strategic interests. While distinct in their specifics, both scenarios raise crucial questions about the credibility of sovereignty and the willingness of nations to adhere to established norms.You might wonder, how will these events shape the future of global order?
The Venezuela Precedent and its Implications for Taiwan
It’s vital to recognize that significant differences exist between taiwan’s democratic processes and the contested elections in Venezuela, where allegations of fraud have plagued the Maduro regime. However, the willingness to overlook breaches of sovereignty isn’t dependent on the reasons behind them. Despite these distinctions, the principle of non-interference is increasingly challenged by geopolitical realities.I’ve found that the idea of consistently applying international law is often sacrificed at the altar of national interest.
Many analysts specializing in China believe the events in Venezuela won’t substantially alter Beijing’s long-term strategy concerning Taiwan. This viewpoint fundamentally inverts customary realist theory, suggesting that if the United States flawlessly adhered to international law, othre nations would reciprocate. China, though, operates based on its own calculations and prioritizes its national objectives above all else.
“Trump’s move is not suddenly going to delay or hasten China’s plans,” asserts Loh, highlighting the self-reliant nature of China’s foreign policy decision-making.
‘Beijing will request the US mute its invocations of international law.’
Ryan hass, former China director on US National Security Council
Bonnie Glaser, a renowned expert on the Indo-Pacific region at the German Marshall Fund, argues that Maduro’s situation isn’t a template for a Chinese takeover of Taiwan.She indicates that Xi Jinping’s ongoing restructuring of the Chinese military leadership-with a focus on addressing corruption and improving readiness-will likely have a more significant impact on Beijing’s strategic considerations. As of November 2023, the shakeup continues, impacting readiness assessments.
“Beijing is rather relying on a vast toolkit of ‘greyzone’ tactics to instil despair among Taiwan’s citizens so that they eventually capitulate,” Glaser shared on X (formerly Twitter). “The Chinese believe that time is on their side to achieve reunification without sacrificing blood and treasure.”
China’s Response and the Erosion of International Norms
Beijing has historically shown scant regard for international norms when it comes to coercing Taiwan. While publicly posturing as a defender of international law, China is likely to leverage the Venezuela affair to demand a lessening of pressure from the US on its own foreign policy initiatives. This leverages China’s established pattern of selectively invoking international law to fit its strategic needs.
According to Ryan Hass, who previously served as China director on the National Security Council, Beijing likely expects the same ”great power exemptions” to international law that the US frequently enough claims for itself. He articulated this sentiment on X,stating,”Beijing will request the US mute its invocations of international law in the South China Sea and elsewhere.”
Did You Know? The South China Sea dispute involves overlapping territorial claims by several countries, including China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei. China’s extensive claims, based
Related reading