Pheu Thai’s Crossroads: Can Thaksin’s Return Stem a Declining Tide?
The recent return of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra to Thailand, and his subsequent imprisonment, has thrown the future of the Pheu Thai Party into sharp relief. While the move generated a wave of initial sympathy, a deeper analysis reveals a party grappling with eroding credibility, potential mass defections, and a fundamental question of its identity.As a long-time observer of Thai politics, I believe Pheu Thai faces a critical juncture – one that will determine whether it remains a significant force or fades into political irrelevance.
(Image: Phichai: Warns of ‘big drop’ in seats – as provided in the original text)
A Credibility Crisis Deepens
For years, Pheu Thai and its predecessors have been dominant players in Thai politics. However,recent events have exacerbated existing concerns about the party’s governance and long-term viability. Political scientist Phichai Ratnatilaka Na Bhuket of NIDA rightly points to a series of issues that have chipped away at public trust: perceived economic mismanagement during previous administrations, the lingering dispute with Cambodia over the Preah Vihear temple, and the ongoing legal battles facing both Thaksin and his daughter, Paetongtarn Shinawatra.
While Thaksin’s decision to face his sentence might be interpreted as a gesture of accountability, it’s unlikely to fundamentally alter these perceptions. As Phichai succinctly puts it,”It isn’t an act of heroism. It is what he must face after avoiding prison for so long.” The sentiment is understandable, but it doesn’t automatically translate into renewed political support.
Recent polling data reinforces this assessment. A June NIDA Poll showed Pheu Thai’s popularity at just 11%, a figure that analysts, including Phichai, predict could fall into single digits. This decline is particularly concerning given the party’s ancient reliance on strong electoral performance.
The Looming Threat of Defections
Perhaps the most immediate threat to Pheu thai’s survival is the potential for widespread defections among its Members of Parliament (MPs). Phichai forecasts a ”big drop” in constituency seats, potentially halving the party’s current representation. The party-list seats, currently at 29, could also plummet to single digits.
This isn’t simply about MPs seeking personal advancement. It’s a pragmatic calculation based on perceived electoral viability. mps in the Northeast, traditionally a Pheu Thai stronghold, are reportedly considering joining Bhumjaithai. Those in the North may gravitate towards Klatham, while representatives in the Central region are exploring options with parties offering stronger campaign support.
The core of Thaksin’s loyal base is shrinking. Phichai estimates that onyl 30-40 MPs remain genuinely devoted to the former Prime Minister. This erosion of loyalty underscores a deeper problem: the perception that Pheu Thai is less a broad-based political institution and more a vehicle for the Shinawatra family’s ambitions. The lack of internal democratic processes - particularly in candidate selection – further reinforces this view.
Is Pheu Thai a True Political institution?
This question is central to the party’s long-term prospects. As Phichai argues, there’s little evidence to suggest Pheu Thai has evolved beyond being a family-centered political machine. Without robust internal mechanisms for member participation and a clear ideological foundation independent of the Shinawatra family, the party risks being perceived as lacking genuine substance.
The attempt to rebrand Pheu Thai as a modern, institutionalized party feels, at this stage, like a belated effort. The fundamental structure and decision-making processes remain heavily influenced by the family, hindering genuine change.
A Gamble on Sympathy – and the Importance of Genuine Accountability
Political scientist Stithorn Thananithichot of Chulalongkorn University offers a nuanced viewpoint. He acknowledges that Thaksin’s imprisonment could provide a temporary boost in sympathy. However,he cautions that this sentiment is fragile.
“Thaksin’s prison term must be seen as genuine to hold political value; if he seeks early release or special treatment, the sentiment could vanish quickly,” Stithorn warns. This is a crucial point. Any perception of preferential treatment would immediately undermine the narrative of accountability and further erode public trust.
Stithorn also rightly criticizes Pheu thai’s attempts to portray Thaksin as a savior figure, arguing that such efforts are premature. The party’s immediate
Keep reading