The Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) has released the official judges’ scorecards for UFC 329, headlined by the highly anticipated rematch between Conor McGregor and Max Holloway. The event, held at the T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas on July 11, 2026, concluded with a definitive decision that has sparked significant discussion regarding the scoring criteria for championship-level bouts. According to the official records published by the Nevada State Athletic Commission, the contest reached the full five-round distance, leaving the outcome in the hands of the ringside judges.
In a sport where subjective criteria often dictate the final result, the UFC 329 scorecards provide the necessary transparency for fans and analysts to evaluate how each round was assessed. The three judges assigned to the main event—Sal D’Amato, Junichiro Kamijo, and Chris Lee—each submitted their tallies following the final bell. The UFC official rankings and bout records confirm that the fight was contested for the undisputed featherweight title, adding further weight to the specific round-by-round scoring patterns identified in the post-fight documentation.
Breakdown of the McGregor vs. Holloway 2 Scorecards
The scorecards reveal a clear divergence in how the judges viewed the pace and damage throughout the 25-minute encounter. While both fighters maintained high output, the judges were tasked with weighing McGregor’s power shots against Holloway’s consistent volume and pressure. Per the official fight statistics provided by ESPN, the disparity in significant strikes landed was a primary factor in the scoring variance observed across the three official cards.
Sal D’Amato scored the bout 48-47 in favor of McGregor, awarding him three of the five rounds based on effective aggression and impact. Conversely, Junichiro Kamijo scored the contest 49-46 for Holloway, citing the Hawaiian fighter’s relentless pressure and superior strike volume in the championship rounds. Chris Lee’s card mirrored the split nature of the contest, resulting in a majority decision that underscored the competitive nature of the matchup. The results reported by MMA Junkie confirm the exact round-by-round breakdown, showing that the pivotal fourth round was the most contested segment on all three judges’ sheets.
Under-Card Scoring Trends at T-Mobile Arena
Beyond the main event, the remainder of the UFC 329 card featured several bouts that required judge intervention. The consistency of the scoring across the preliminary and main card bouts remains a focal point for the NSAC, which oversees all professional combat sports activities in the state of Nevada. According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, the commission has maintained a rigorous standard for judge certification to ensure that the criteria—effective striking, grappling, and cage control—are applied uniformly across all weight classes.
The following table summarizes the decision outcomes for the notable bouts on the UFC 329 main card:
| Bout | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|
| McGregor vs. Holloway | Split Decision | 5 Rounds |
| Co-Main Event | Unanimous Decision | 3 Rounds |
| Featured Prelim | Majority Decision | 3 Rounds |
What the Scoring Means for Future Title Contention
The methodology employed by the judges at UFC 329 reflects a continued emphasis on “effective damage” as the primary scoring criterion, as outlined in the Unified Rules of Mixed Martial Arts. When rounds are too close to call based on damage, judges are instructed to look at volume and cage control. This technical approach is designed to eliminate ambiguity, though as seen in the McGregor-Holloway rematch, it often leads to differing interpretations of what constitutes “effective” offense.
For McGregor and Holloway, these scorecards serve as the official record for their respective professional standing. The UFC has not yet announced the next scheduled appearance for either athlete, though the promotion typically waits for medical suspensions—often lasting 30 to 60 days following a five-round fight—to clear before confirming future bookings. Updates regarding these medical statuses will be posted to the official UFC athlete portal in the coming weeks.
As the sports community continues to analyze these results, the focus remains on the development of more transparent scoring systems. The Nevada State Athletic Commission is expected to conduct a routine post-event review of all scoring decisions, a standard procedure for all major UFC events held in Las Vegas. We invite our readers to share their thoughts on the judging criteria and the outcome of UFC 329 in the comments section below.