The White House has asked the United States Department of Justice to weigh potential new charges against David Hearn, a former Olympian who was previously accused of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal. The request seeks to revive a legal battle that has drawn public scrutiny following a decision by federal prosecutors to drop the initial case due to insufficient evidence.
The underlying legal saga began when Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, officially dismissed the charges against Hearn on July 31. In a 20-page filing detailing the dismissal, Pirro’s office pointed to a flawed installation by a contractor and noted that evidence indicated damage to the pool predated Hearn’s visit. The filing stated that it was difficult to attribute the widespread damage to vandalism or to establish culpability beyond a reasonable doubt. Hearn consistently maintained his innocence, explaining that he simply reached into the water to touch a piece of already detached lining during a June bike ride.
Following the dismissal, President Donald Trump publicly rebuked Pirro on social media platforms, accusing her of having “choked.” According to The Guardian, the White House subsequently approached officials at Main Justice in Washington, D.C., to explore options for a new prosecution. It remains unclear what legal basis or new evidence the administration might use to file fresh charges against Hearn.
The Justice Department did not directly confirm whether it was actively considering new charges in response to the White House inquiry. In an email statement reported by The Guardian, a department spokesperson emphasized standard operating principles: “The Department of Justice follows the evidence when determining if crimes have been committed. We always evaluate any case based on the facts and the law.”
The White House request has been characterized as an extraordinary intervention. Traditionally, the executive branch maintains an arm’s-length relationship with federal prosecutors to preserve institutional impartiality and prevent political interference in criminal charging decisions. Attorney General Todd Blanche, recently confirmed by the Senate, offered praise for Pirro while maintaining an equivocal stance on the dismissal during public remarks. Blanche noted that while he does not routinely approve or disapprove individual decisions made by U.S. attorneys, the president holds the ultimate authority to dismiss a federal prosecutor.
Defense Reaction and Congressional Scrutiny
Legal representatives for David Hearn strongly criticized the prospect of a renewed prosecution. In a joint statement provided by defense attorneys Norm Eisen, Mary Dohrmann, and Steve Levin, the team called any potential new case “another bizarre turn” that would mark a precedent of a dismissed case returning despite a lack of conviction evidence.
Meanwhile, the handling of the case has triggered broader congressional inquiries. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill, including House Democrats seeking records related to the dropped prosecution, have launched probes examining the circumstances surrounding Pirro’s reversal and the administration’s involvement in the matter, as reported by The Hill and The Washington Post.
As federal officials weigh their next steps following the July 31 dismissal, further developments hinge on whether Main Justice formally initiates new filings or if congressional investigators uncover additional administrative records.
Keep reading