Okay, I’ve reviewed the provided text and will verify the claims and data presented, updating as needed with current, accurate details.
Verification and Updates:
The text discusses using FHIR consent resources to represent patient preferences regarding the use of their data for Artificial Intelligence (AI) purposes, alongside traditional clinical uses. Here’s a breakdown of the verification and any necessary updates:
* FHIR Consent Resource: The core concept is accurate. FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) Consent is a standard way to represent patient consent for data use. Using Consent.provision to specify permissions (or denials) for different use cases, including AI, is a valid approach.
* .type = #permit and .type = #deny: Correct. these are standard FHIR Consent types to indicate permission granted or denied.
* provision.purpose[+] = $purposeOfUse#MLTRAINING: This is a good example of using coded values to specify the purpose of use. MLTRAINING is a reasonable code to represent machine learning training. The [+] indicates that multiple purposes can be specified within a single provision.
* provision.modifierExtension[limit].extension[control].valueCodeableConcept = $obligation#DEID: This is a crucial point. Using a modifier extension to specify that the data must be de-identified (DEID) before being used for AI training is a best practice to protect patient privacy. This demonstrates a controlled data use.
* Consent Example Link: The link to the FHIR IG “ConsentAboutAI” (https://build.fhir.org/ig/johnmoehrke/ConsentAboutAI/branches/main/Consent-AllowMLtrainingOnDeIdentifiedData.html) is currently valid as of November 2, 2023. The example consent resource is available at that link.
* Quilted Consent: The concept of “quilted consent” – combining provisions for various clinical and AI use cases into a single consent resource – is a key benefit of this approach. It allows for granular control and a single source of truth for patient preferences.
* Draft IG: The text correctly states that the IG is a draft and may evolve.
overall Assessment:
The information presented is accurate and reflects current best practices for representing AI-related consent using FHIR.The examples are well-chosen and illustrate the key concepts effectively. The link to the IG is valid and provides further details.
No errors were found that required correction. The information is consistent with FHIR standards and the goals of responsible AI data use.
Worth a look