Vitas TOMKUS: NAUSĖDA RECALLED WITH A NEW SLOGAN – “THE STATE IS US!” – Respublika.lt

#Vitas #TOMKUS #NAUSĖDA #RECALLED #SLOGAN #STATE #Respublika.lt

×

‘;
document.getElementById(‘gallery_mobile_banner’).style.display = ‘inline-block’;
$jQuery_1_10_1(‘#galleryMobileBanner’).empty();
$jQuery_1_10_1(‘#galleryMobileBanner’).append(galleryMobileBanner);
$jQuery_1_10_1(‘.lazy-banner-mobile-gallery’).Lazy();
if (screen.width

We only criticized that the only one of the candidates did not come up with a slogan and – here you are (quoting): “Well, my slogan would be – “Strong state – strong family!” The state and its security is our most important priority, because if the state is not safe, no other goals impossible to achieve.”

According to LRT, it is extremely important for Nausėda that all children have the same starting opportunities, can use non-formal education, and that pensions are dignified. “How can the strength of the family be guaranteed?” Nausėda asked himself and answered to himself: “This, of course, is primarily the state’s attention to the family, and the state must take care of the family – both its young members and children, from their adolescence and childhood until their respectable old age.” age.”

After listening to such wise words of Gitana, about equal starting opportunities for children (Perhaps – from airports?), about non-formal education (With the help of LGBT and Bartošević?), about children’s pensions (No comments!), and most importantly, that a strong state is a strong family, and to end his tirade of empty slogans with the words of Louis XIV: “The state is WE!” If anyone has forgotten, I will remind you that this is how the king of France, who was fooled, addressed himself.

Personally, after listening to the speech of the most realistic candidate for the president of Lithuania about the state, I personally missed the epithet “Welfare”. Isn’t everything already so good in the state of Lithuania that nobody needs welfare anymore? We lived with the welfare state during Nausėda’s first term and that’s enough? Time for the starting positions: who is in war, who is emigrating…

In my opinion, when the state becomes a vassal of the USA and a jackal of the EU, it is simply indecent and dishonorable to criticize a strong state and, even more so, a strong family. In addition, it is very funny when LGBT programs are already compulsory in schools, children are taken away from their families (no longer only in Norway), the leaders of the Seimas rush to Istanbul, which itself renounced the degenerate convention a long time ago, and a million Lithuanians, fed up with Lithuanian prosperity, set out to find a better life abroad. We have lived to the point where, while declaring ourselves the happiest people in the world, we have at the same time become famous for frequent suicides. (Are we already crazy with happiness?!)

I will admit that, tired of my own and foreign thieves’ demagogy, I am more and more inclined towards the candidacy of Professor Vaitkaus. Not Vēgėlė and not Žemaitaitis, whom I sympathize with perhaps even more, but Vaitkaus. Because there is neither time nor energy to maneuver like those two, between good and evil. And the most important thing is that soon there will be no more normal people who still care about the poor Lithuania of their ancestors. Even a hundred years, which Oželytė guaranteed for Lithuania’s agony, will no longer be needed. In the worst case, if Vaitkus doesn’t even win, after counting the votes for him, it will at least be clear how many adequate and indifferent people are still left in Lithuania and is it worth being here and rotting?

I will share my arguments and insights…

When the building is already in a state of emergency and is barely supported by scaffolding, it is irrational and even stupid to talk about its cosmetic repairs and fixing the scaffolding. It’s just a waste of money, a waste of time, and a postponement of disaster or disaster. Therefore, any compromise conclusions of the candidates about the need to prepare for war and allocate people’s funds to defense are too dangerous. Because the best defense is an attack, which the leaders of NATO countries are already openly talking about, and if Lithuanian people’s taxes continue to be wasted on the well-being of other countries (not only Ukraine, but also Jews and immigrants, including Belarusians and Russians), Lithuanian cadets may be left without “rear”. And this is very, very dangerous for any front!

On that occasion, I dare to note that I do not know of a single war in history, after which territories were not redistributed, usually to the detriment of the smaller ones! Therefore, I cannot understand and justify the enthusiasm of the Lithuanian authorities, fomenting discord between neighboring countries and raising war hysteria. There is no time to guess whether she is doing it out of stupidity, or greed, or despair, that she has stolen so much that only war can save them from responsibility?

Today, when all the red lines have already been crossed, it is definitely not a time for jackals and not vassals. I know that politics is the art of compromise, but not today, when all nations are being pushed into the meat grinder of war. It can’t be worse, so even Vaitkus, who bravely and quite restrainedly voices what real Lithuanians feel in their hearts, could not do anything worse even if he wanted to. Except for yourself…

P.S. Finally, I would like to draw Professor Vaitkaus’ attention to the fact that the fate of the “hearty President” Paks was not the worst option…